Northern New Mexico College Study Group
  • Home
  • Blue Sky Builders / Ryan Cordova
  • Monument, LLC
  • MEDIA
  • Records
  • Blog
  • Budget
  • Letters

Proposed "Academic And Student Affairs Committee" Violates NM Constitution, Open Meetings Act, NNMC Faculty Policies, and Shared Governance

3/25/2015

2 Comments

 
PictureEx-Regent Michael Branch
 At the Thursday, March 26th Board of Regents meeting, the Board will vote on a proposal for an “Academic and Student Affairs Committee,” authored by ex-Regent Michael Branch (who also named himself the Chair of the Committee in the proposal, see full proposal above). The “Academic and Student Affairs Committee,” if approved, would erode the governing function of the Board of Regents in violation of the New Mexico State Constitution and would destroy all semblance of shared governance jeopardizing the College’s accreditation.

As proposed, all activities of the entire college would be funneled through the “Academic and Student Affairs Committee.” The Committee would function as a screen, controlling what the Board of Regents itself is allowed to see, hear, and deliberate upon. In addition, the Committee would completely negate any action the faculty takes (there is no faculty member of this committee), as any actions would require approval by the Committee before it goes to the Board. Indeed, the Committee has the power to remove or revise anything proposed by faculty and substitute their own version.

It is abundantly clear that by standards of shared governance—as measured by Academic Quality Improvement Program (AQIP), the college’s accrediting agency, the Higher Learning Commission (HLC), and the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) that such a Committee would violate basic standards of shared governance. The Committee is specifically designed to erode shared governance, making the role of the faculty, faculty committees and the Faculty Senate obsolete. Such a move is likely a violation of AQIP standards, our accreditation requirements from the Higher Learning Commission, and the guidelines of the AAUP. Power over curriculum, teaching, research, programs and degree decisions would—by virtue of the Committee—be given to four people: two Board members, Provost Pedro Martinez, and one “at large member” to be appointed by the Board of Regents.

We might notice two key things about the design of the four person Committee:

1) The “at large member” would be appointed by the Board and given the power to govern every aspect of the college. As we are aware, per the New Mexico Constitution, the New Mexico State Governor is charged with appointing Regents to govern Northern New Mexico College. The proposed “Academic and Student Affairs Committee” would thus create an extra-legal appointment by the NNMC Board. This would circumvent the power to appoint that is granted to the State Governor in the NM State Constitution.

           
2) Ex-Regent Michael Branch has also designed the Committee so that it has only two Regents—a clear attempt at preventing a quorum, which is subject to the Open Meetings Act. The “Academic and Student Affairs” Committee is designed specifically in violation the Open Meetings Act. However, the NM Attorney General has stated that “even a non-statutory body appointed by a public body may constitute a ‘policymaking’ body subject to the Act.” [i]


This would most certainly be the case, much to the dismay of ex-Regent Branch, as the Committee “
attends to students’ concerns about matters such as tuition, fees; financial aid, admissions, retention, student success and graduation requirements, faculty teaching and advisement; student life, student conduct and housing rules and staff support and services.” Further, the “Academic and Student Affairs Committee” proposal explains: the four person Committee will both “approve and recommend” strategic plans, mission statements, budgets, development or cancellation of academic programs, establishment of colleges, departments, institutes and programs. The proposed Committee will both “approve and recommend” changes to policies and procedures for faculty and students, changes to enrollment management, graduation standards, and even intellectual property rights of faculty and students.

Given the power granted to the four person “Academic and Student Affairs Committee,”        we may ask why have a governing Board of Regents at all?

The NNMC Study Group encourages the Board of Regents to vote no on the proposed “Academic and Student Affairs Committee,” as its adoption will violate the NM State Constitution and jeopardize the college’s accreditation.

We recommend that the members of the Board of Regents research issues of the Constitutional powers and responsibilities granted the Regents, the requirements of the Open Meeting Act, and the principles of shared governance as required by AQIP, HLC—our accreditation agency, and the AAUP.

The Regents should note that the AAUP is currently investigating Northern New Mexico College for violations of shared governance (as reported in both The Journal and the Rio Grande Sun in 2014).

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[i] “Open Meetings Act Guide 2015,” New Mexico Office of the Attorney General, pg. 9. https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=bm1hZy5nb3Z8dGVzdC1ubWFnfGd4OjdkYjUwMTgyNGQyNzljMw



2 Comments
Anonymous
3/27/2015 01:23:40 am

A superb write-up of this very suspect committee- Academic Affairs and Student Affairs. It seemed all along it would merely be a rubber-stamp mechanism for the Board of Regents' agenda, but this article pointed out all the other illegal implications, especially how much power this group would have over the college. Even with the exit of two regents recently, could one of them possibly be the "at large" member and continue to manipulate and control? And yes, shared governance is out the window. Thank you for such research about this proposed committee.

Reply
Chimayo Girl
3/27/2015 02:30:18 pm

Thank you for this informative article. It is clear that this committee is garnering power to itself, bypassing any real input by the academic community. If the board goes along with this misguided idea, then they will not be in compliance with the responsibilities given to them by the governor. This administration has ruined many fine programs, and this proposed committee will eventually decide which programs will get the axe. Poor Northern, it is in a heap of trouble.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    New Mexico Legislature on SB-603 NNMC Name Change Bill 

    Parts 1-8, featuring NNMC President Nancy "Rusty" Barcelo, VP Domingo Sanchez, VP Ricky Serna, and the Public Affairs Committee of the NM Senate.
    Tweets by @NNMCStudyGroup

    Feb NNMC Regents Agenda

    Picture
    NNMC Board of Regents Meeting, February 26th, 8:30am. NOTE: "Approval of Tuition Increase" on agenda. (Click image for full meeting agenda)

    Archives

    September 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014

    Categories

    All
    AAUP
    Adjunct Faculty
    Anti-SLAPP Law
    Blue Sky Builders
    Branch Realty
    Branch Realty Commercial Advisers
    Brandi Cordova
    Dorms
    El Rito
    Federal Grant
    HEP Grant
    IPRA
    Kevin Powers
    Lisa Duran
    LLC
    MALCS
    Michael Branch
    Mildred Martinez
    Mondrall Sperling
    Monument
    Nancy "Rusty" Barcelo
    NM Auditor
    NM Board Of Finance
    NMFEE
    NNNC Board Of Regents
    Public Records
    RBC
    RBC Capital Markets
    Ricky Serna
    Rusty Barcelo
    Ryan Cordova
    Student Housing
    Susana Martinez
    Tuition Hike

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.